Write For Us

Pitch us a crypto article

Send your pitch to editor@usacryptoreports.com. That link opens an email with the questions below already in it – answer them inline and send.

  • Your topic and the specific angle
  • What makes it different from what already ranks
  • Any link you want included – the URL and the anchor text
  • Whether you have a commercial relationship with anything named in the piece
  • Where else it has been published, if anywhere
  • Your sources, and a byline plus one-line bio

Telling us about a commercial interest does not disqualify a piece – we run disclosed contributions. It decides whether the article is labelled editorial or sponsored, and whether outbound links carry rel="sponsored". Finding out afterwards is the only version that ends badly. Prefer a form? Use the contact form instead.

USA Crypto Reports publishes reported and analytical articles on cryptocurrency, with particular depth on Bitcoin ATMs and the machinery that moves cash into crypto and back out again. Readers are a mix of operators, compliance staff, host-location owners, investors doing due diligence, and people who found a Bitcoin ATM in a gas station and want to know what it actually does. We take contributed pieces that add reporting, data, or operational detail to that conversation.

Which section fits your pitch

  • General cryptocurrency pieces – explainers and reporting that do not belong to a single coin, exchange, or technology.
  • Coverage of Bitcoin itself – protocol changes, custody practices, transaction mechanics, mempool behavior.
  • Anything on Bitcoin ATMs – machines, operators, host businesses, fee structures, and the cash-to-crypto layer generally. This is our core beat.
  • Work on blockchain as infrastructure – how a chain actually settles, consensus tradeoffs, throughput claims checked against reality.
  • Reporting on crypto exchanges – custody arrangements, listing practices, and what happens when an exchange fails.
  • Pieces on crypto mining – hardware economics, energy contracts, and the numbers behind a mining operation’s margins.
  • Coverage of crypto regulation – licensing regimes, enforcement actions, and what a compliance requirement actually obligates a business to do.
  • Work on crypto security – key management, custody failures, scam mechanics, and recovery.
  • Analysis of DeFi protocols and the specific risks they carry, not the case for decentralization in general.
  • Reporting on Ethereum – the network, smart contract activity, and the ecosystem built on top of it.

What works here

  • Specific, checkable claims with a source attached. Numbers beat adjectives, and a number with a source beats a number without one.
  • Operational detail – how a fee is actually calculated, what a compliance rule requires a business to file, what a machine operator has to do to keep a license current, what a host location earns per transaction.
  • Original reporting or original data – a survey you ran, a fee comparison across operators you actually built, photographs you took at a location, records you pulled and read.
  • Work that holds up under a fact-check. If a claim cannot be traced to a primary source, expect it to be cut or sent back.

What does not

  • Price predictions, investment advice, or guaranteed-return language.
  • Token or presale promotion of any kind, disclosed or not.
  • Rewrites of what is already sitting on the first page of Google with nothing added.
  • Articles built around a single link, with the surrounding text serving as filler for it.
  • Vague trend pieces with no source that could not have been written before the underlying event actually happened.

Requirements

  • 1,000-1,500 words, original, not previously published anywhere else, including your own site.
  • Sources linked inline to primary material – the filing, the regulator’s page, the company statement, the dataset – not to a summary of it.
  • A real author bio and a verifiable identity. We will check.
  • We edit for accuracy and style, and we fact-check before publication. Expect queries back if a claim needs a stronger source.
  • If your topic touches our Bitcoin ATM directory or figures like it, use verified numbers only. We built ours by checking 200 listings by hand and found 41 no longer existed, roughly one in five – that is the standard of verification we expect from a contributor’s numbers too.

Submissions are free

There is no fee to submit and no fee to publish right now. We may open a paid placement option later, and if we do, it will be clearly labelled as sponsored or paid at the point of publication, not buried in a footer. Until then, do not send payment, and do not expect a paid fast-track – every piece goes through the same review whether you are a first-time contributor or someone we have run before.

How to pitch

Send your pitch to editor@usacryptoreports.com. Include the topic, your specific angle, and what makes it different from what is already published on the subject – if you cannot answer that last part, the piece probably is not ready yet. Tell us which of the ten sections above it fits, mention any original data or reporting you already have in hand, and attach a short bio with a way to verify who you are. A pitch that names a primary source before we ask for one moves faster than one that does not.

Questions

Do you cover topics outside these ten categories?

Occasionally, if the piece is clearly about the cash-to-crypto layer or a closely adjacent part of the crypto industry. Pitch it and say plainly why it belongs on the site even though it does not fit one of the listed sections. We would rather see the pitch than have you guess and skip it.

Will you cover the Bitcoin Depot bankruptcy?

Yes, and we take pitches on it. Bitcoin Depot filed Chapter 11 in May 2026 and more than 9,000 machines were deactivated as a result, which touches operators, host locations, and users directly. A pitch with specifics – a location you tracked, a compliance angle, a comparison of what happened to competing operators – is more useful to us than a general summary of the filing.

How long does review take?

It varies with our editing queue and how much a draft needs. A clean piece with sources already linked and claims already checkable moves faster than one that needs several rounds of fact-checking. We will tell you if a piece is rejected rather than leave you waiting.

What happens if a claim in my draft cannot be verified?

We ask you for a better source, and if one is not available, the claim gets cut, not softened. This applies to figures about Bitcoin ATM counts, exchange volumes, mining costs, and anything else presented as fact. Our own directory work is the example we hold contributors to – we checked our listings by hand rather than assuming they were still accurate.

Search operators for finding crypto guest post opportunities

If you place guest posts for a living, these are the strings that surface sites accepting crypto contributions. They are here because the people we most want to hear from are usually the ones already running these searches – and because a site that asks for contributors should be findable by the same queries it expects writers to use. Paste any of them into Google as-is.

crypto + "guest blog" crypto + "contributor guidelines"
crypto + "guest blogger" crypto + "write for us"
crypto + "guest column" crypto + "write for me"
crypto + "guest article" crypto + "become a contributor"
crypto + "guest posts wanted" crypto + "contribute to this site"
crypto + "guest post opportunities" crypto + "guest poster wanted"
crypto + "become a guest blogger" crypto + "looking for guest posts"
crypto + "contributing writer" crypto + "become an author"
crypto + "submit blog post" crypto + "submit guest post"
crypto + "accepting guest posts" crypto + "suggest a post"
crypto + "contribute to our site" crypto + inurl:category/guest
crypto + "submit content" crypto + inurl:contributors
crypto + "submit your article" allintitle:crypto guest post
crypto + "guest post guidelines" allintitle:crypto write for us
allintitle:crypto submit blog post

How to use them: the quoted phrases find pages whose wording matches an invitation to contribute. allintitle: narrows to pages with every one of those words in the title tag, which is the tightest filter and the shortest list. inurl: catches sites whose contributor section lives at a predictable path. Run the allintitle: lines first – they return the pages most likely to be genuinely open – then widen out.